In Part I, I identified and discussed what I believe is a serious issue in the world of martial arts today - The practice of tailoring attacks to fit defenses.
I had a lot of great comments on that post.
So now that I've identified the problem...
What
can we do about it?
Well, it’s
not the easiest thing to fix. It’s
actually a bit more complicated than it might appear on the surface. So, what does it take?
- An understanding of what real
attacks look like. In a safe
training environment, it can be challenging to have people attack realistically,
especially if they’ve never been involved in real violence before. You must balance the need for scripted
attacks based on real world probability and the need to have an element of
unpredictability.
- The decision not to stop if
your partner attacks incorrectly.
Figure it out. If your intended technique doesn’t work, adjust it
or change it to one that does.
Only after successfully working through it should you request the
‘proper’ version for the next time.
- The understanding that you need
to break away from exact responses to exact techniques. As time goes on, the requested
technique/defense selection should get broader. For example, ask for an arm lock or a wrist throw from a
punch, but leave it to the attacker to decide which type. Or from a grab, any type. This way you have a general goal
in mind, but the attacks, and subsequently your responses, will have to vary. This will help you develop the mental
flexibility and the physical skills needed to respond to the unpredictable
nature of a real violent encounter.
- Building on number 3 - Use randori, or free practice. No set attacks, no set defenses. Just spontaneous attack and defence, preferably with multiple attackers. You’ll quickly forget about someone attacking wrong and you’ll just do what you have to do. See previous posts on Randori here.(links to several in post)
- Testing criteria should take all
of this into account as well.
In my system (the one I study), the higher the belt ranking, the
fewer the number of techniques are outlined in ‘required’ lists. Instead of having each technique
listed and from what attack, it simply lists things like:
THROWS:
Type - Hip (3 variations)
Attack – Punch/Kick/Grab - Any
In this example, it could be any punch. Then any kick. There’s still structure for required
techniques and an order for grading, but a certain degree of spontaneity is
maintained.
Go higher and you’ll find:
THROWS:
Type - All
Attack - Any
Essentially controlled, or led, randori.
Earlier belt grading will have set lists which outline the specific attack
and the specific response required.
Anyone can
spend enough time and memorize a set number of attack/defense combinations. On the surface, demonstrating forty
techniques in a row from a lapel grab or a choke may look impressive, but in
truth, it doesn’t tell you too much about the student’s ability to defend
themselves. The same can be said for kata, but that's a topic that deserves it's own post.
I’d rather
see three or four well performed responses in randori. The true measure of
success is the student’s ability to react, adapt and respond successfully to
unscripted, unrehearsed and unpredictable attacks, all while under stress. It doesn’t really matter which
technique they select, as long as they react immediately and are able to adapt
and adjust as needed until they reach a successful conclusion. It doesn’t have to be pretty, as long
as you never freeze up or stop fighting.
This is how
it is with real violence, so it’s important to recreate this dynamic (safely) as
much as possible in training.
CONCLUSION:
At the
start of our journeys, we work on building a decent foundation. Repetitive practice of a set number of
techniques is one excellent method for developing a good amount of skill in the
basics. Once you have the
mechanics nailed down, it’s time to build on that foundation. Learning to apply and adapt to more
realistic attacks is important.
Don’t get
stuck in a right or wrong way of attacking or defending. Shift away from specific techniques and
understand that often your response will most often be dependent on what option
is presented to you, not what you have pre-selected in order to deal with an
incoming attack. This is where the
concept of Mushin, or empty/no mind, comes into play. Not many people can observe, identify, and then select a
specific response to an unexpected and spontaneous attack in time to execute it
successfully.
Strive to
be like the willow tree. The
willow can survive storms that topple other rigid trees. The willow, while it has a strong set
of roots, is flexible. It doesn’t
fight against the force of the storm; it simply adapts and adjusts by being
flexible. So too, should you be at
higher levels of training.
Don’t
tailor your attacks to fit your defenses.
Don’t practice attacking or defending in ways you never would in a real
situation. Strive to achieve
Mushin. Accept that real violence
in unpredictable and that even a successful defense will rarely resemble the
smooth response you so deftly demonstrated in a controlled training
environment. Don’t worry about
looking sloppy.
Establish
roots in the basics but never stop your training there. Learn to apply and adapt and always remain
flexible.
Train well.
Great advice here. Thanks for the article - very useful :-)
ReplyDeleteThanks Sue!
ReplyDelete